Tuesday, 30 July 2024

It is an opportune time!

 It is an opportune time!

Many despair and have a perspective of hopelessness with what is happening in Nigeria. Rightfully so, one must say and agree.

However, it presents an excellent opportunity for the President to etch his name in gold. As his title translates, it is an opportune time for him to take the lead and show empathy, listen to the citizens and talk with them, giving hope and assurance that things will improve.

It is also an opportune time to take the lead in adjusting, even as he asks the citizens to adjust. It is not the time to be silent. It is also not the time to send messages to the citizens through mouthpieces that cannot convey the president's heart. It is an opportune time not to speak English (though the official language) but to speak to the citizens in our native languages. It is indeed an opportune time to bring the citizens close.

It is an opportune time to back up the speeches with well-thought-out actions, focusing on the really important things, and learn not to wait until there is the voice of dissent and agitation to become uneasy.

It is also an opportune time for the legislature and judiciary to show responsibility by suspending their recesses to address the important issues of national interest, as many global leaders have done in the past and still do, jettisoning vacations in the interest of their nations.

It is an opportune time for the agencies of government to put on the face of humanity and justice, where the same tools and mechanisms rumoured to have been used to identify some persons who are encouraging chaos are used to apprehend those who have been suspected terrorized citizens by such dastardly acts as kidnapping, rustling, robberies etc which has gone on for too long.

It is indeed an opportune time for a #BetterNigeria to arise.

Thursday, 25 February 2021

Traffic Manhours and the Economy - February 2021

Traffic Man Hours and the Economy – Report

By Musa D. Sunday and Adebayo A. Wuraola

Introduction

Other than supporting research from unlimited studies (The Economist, 2018; Economics Online, n.d.; Melissa et al., 2018; etc), it is well known that traffic congestion exists, particularly in major cities around the world. Time spent in traffic is frustrating and has multiple negative implications for drivers’ physical and mental health, for businesses and possibly for the economy. The Economist (2018) states that congestion inflicts high economic costs, with cities like New York cost 34 billion dollars as a result of road congestion in 2017. While Economics Online (n.d.) suggests that several other factors, in combination with time lost in road congestion, can be linked to damaging economies. Factors including fuel costs, health costs from treating stress, business costs, poor functioning of emergency services, etc. From another perspective, congested roads may also be a symbol of economic growth due to increasing income levels and employment rate (Takyi et al., 2013). However, the focus of this study is solely on the cost of manhours lost in traffic.

The aim of this study is to establish a link between only the hours spent in traffic to losses in the economy. The target group is Nigeria, particularly the major cities like Lagos.

Concept

The concept behind this study is that there is a link between work hours lost in traffic and the economy, as illustrated below.

Figure 1: Sample conceptual framework for congestion (Takyi et al., 2013)


 

Methodology

A survey was carried out in January 2020 on working Nigerians. This survey aimed to determine the relationship between the manhours spent in traffic and the economy. Overall, there were 108 responses to the survey, and the results are analysed below.

The survey was created as an online questionnaire, using Microsoft Forms, and was distributed to a diverse range of Nigerians via a WhatsApp platform. This method of distribution was used because WhatsApp is a popular means of communication in Nigeria, and it is a faster and more direct method of reaching participants.

The questionnaire was introduced with a summary and purpose of the survey. Participants were informed of the average length of the questionnaire and that they were not obliged to fill it. They were also reassured that their responses were confidential and that no information that could personally identify them would be collected.

A link to the survey results can be found here: https://forms.office.com/Pages/AnalysisPage.aspx?id=iKVYt2B4yEKbha3eSDMkV2e8QfSRWldDnS9vY3cLxZxUOTVKUEVXU0JVNThJRlIxUFlGV0RNNVlKWi4u&AnalyzerToken=rhyDfuJGMtdGjwR8EVI12SCr5CXNk7na

The results were also pooled into an Excel sheet, which was used to analyse the data.

Results

General Information

Of the 108 respondents, 62 (57%) were male, 44 (41%) were female, and two (2%) preferred not to disclose their gender.

Figure 2: Gender

 



A look at the age ranges of all the respondents shows that majority of Nigerians who commute to work daily fall within the ages of 16 to 60, which is in line with the retirement age in Nigeria.

Table 1: Age range

Age range

Number of respondents

16–30

13 (12%)

31–45

82(76%)

46–60

13 (12%)

61–75

0

Other

0

 

As for work location in Nigeria, 31 (29%) respondents work on the Lagos mainland, 45 (42%) work on the Lagos island, six (6%) work in Port Harcourt, eight (7%) work in Abuja, and the other 18 (17%) respondents work in other cities in different states, including Abeokuta, Ota, Minna, Bini river, Ibadan, Anambra, Kaduna, Akure, Osun, Ogbomoso, and Delta; with the majority of the respondents (23) earning between 100 and 200 thousand naira monthly.

Transportation means and time spent in traffic

The survey went on to find out about the respondents’ means of transportation and how long it usually takes to get to work and back home.

Majority of the respondents (75, 69%) use a car as a means of transport to work.

Figure 3: Means of transport

 




Moreover, an analysis of these 75 people shows that 50 (about 67%) of them work in Lagos. Other respondents across the country use public buses, motorcycles, boat, staff bus, and one respondent stated that they also use aircraft to get to work.

Without accounting for the distance between their homes and their places of work, or what time they left home/workplace, it was found that majority of them (35, 32%) spend between 0–30 minutes to get to work and back home. Then, another 32 (30%) of them spend between 31 minutes–1 hour to get to work and back home. It is interesting to note that for almost all the respondents, the time they should ideally spend on the roads for each journey ranged from 15 minutes to as high as 45 minutes or 1 hour less than the time they actually spend on the roads. For a couple of respondents who work on the Lagos island and use public transport, the difference in their actual commute time and what it should ideally be was as much as almost 2 hours. It can be assumed that these ones live somewhere on Lagos mainland. On average, it can be assumed that about 1 hour is wasted on the roads, both in the morning and evening, making an average total of 2 hours.

Figure 4: Time spent on roads in the morning (same as evening)



Figure 5: Ideal time they should spend on roads (same as evening)

 


 

Also, about 87% of the respondents spend between 8 and 9 hours at work each day.

Figure 6: Hours spent at work each day

 


When asked how often they were late to work or appointments because of traffic, on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘Never’ and 5 being ‘Always’, the following was discovered:

Figure 7: Being late



While people were not always late, on average, they quite often got late as a result of traffic.

 Analysis and Discussion

Using this data sample as a representation of the country, it is quite clear that most workers use cars as a means of transport, possibly including those sharing rides. This automatically explains the large number of vehicles on the roads, which is a contribution to the traffic faced, especially in Lagos.

Now, most of the respondents spend 8 hours at work every day. Traffic is usually a frustrating process of cars moving slowly and repeatedly, causing unnecessary adverse effects on the body and mental health. For a respondent who spends 2 hours on the road in the morning and 2 hours in the evening, that is already 4 hours of stress. By the time they get to work, they are probably already late, stressed and angry (Melissa et al., 2018). Assuming that it takes about 20 or 30 minutes to get settled in at work, this amounts to about 4 hours 30 minutes of unproductive time each day.

There are 24 hours in a day. Eight hours spent at work plus 4 hours 30 minutes of unproductive time make approximately 13 hours. It is not known what workers do in the rest of their non-work time, but it is safe to assume that what they do outside work and during work affects their sleep time significantly. The recommended sleep time for an adult is at least 7–9 hours (SleepFoundation.org, 2015). Research has shown repeatedly that the typical Lagosian does not get enough sleep (Tribune Online, 2019). There is also the case of exposure to air pollution while sitting for long hours in traffic (Melissa et al., 2018). This also has a negative impact on the health of workers.

Now, this continues over a long period, and the employee is fatigued and stressed. There is no morale to work to full efficiency because they are always tired. Occasionally, costly mistakes are made too. How does this relate to the economy?

For one employee, this may not matter. However, for a considerable percentage of each organisation’s employee, this is a big deal. Productivity may drop and keep dropping (Melissa et al., 2018). This may affect projects, revenues and timescales, to mention a few. And one way or another, its effect might be felt in the country’s economy.

Inference

Suppose an inference on what is lost yearly due to lost time in traffic in Nigeria could be made based on the analysis above, then an estimate of losses to the economy could be determined using the 108 respondents as a representation of the whole country.

·       Manhours lost: On average, the respondents lose 2 hours in traffic daily. This amounts to about 502 hours lost per year (at 251 working days in a year).

·       Daily cost lost: Ignoring the variance in the wages of the respondents and focusing on the minimum wage, the cost of the hours lost in traffic can be determined. The minimum wage in Nigeria is =N=30,000 per month (Trading Economics, 2020). On average, each respondent works 8 hours per day, and the average number of weekdays in a month is approximately 22 days. Based on 22 weekdays per month, the minimum wage is about 57 naira per hour. From this, it can be determined that on average, each respondent loses about 114 naira (2 hours x =N=57) daily from time spent in traffic.

·       Yearly cost lost: If there are 251 working days (accounts for standard public holidays) in a year in Nigeria, then each respondent loses about =N=28,614 (=N=114 x 251 working days OR 502 working hours x =N=57) yearly on average.

·       The bigger picture: As at 2020, the workforce in Nigeria represents about 69.5 million people (Trading Economics, 2020). By projecting the respondents unto the Nigerian workforce, it can be determined that approximately =N=1.9 trillion (1,988,673,000,000) is lost annually by Nigerians based on the minimum wage as a result of the average time lost in traffic (69.5 million x =N=28,614 lost per person).

Lagos State – The hotspot

Assuming the labour cost for one day (10 hours’ work approximately) is set at =N=3,000.00, 1 hour would cost =N=300.00. An average of 4 hours 30 minutes of unproductive work spent in traffic daily would amount to =N=1,350.00 for one person per day. In a year of 300 days of work, this comes to the sum of =N=405,000.00 in a year for one person.

The National Manpower Stock and Employment Generation Survey by National Bureau of Statistics in 2010 put the labour force of Lagos State at 3,800,531 (this would have increased considerably given the time interval between when the survey was published and when this research was conducted). Consequently, the amount Lagos State may be losing due to traffic would be about =N=1,539,215,055,000.00 in one year.

Several factors contribute to the traffic situation across the nation. Most significant of these include bad road network, erratic and reckless behaviour of drivers, poor vehicle maintenance, which leads to breakdowns, and availability of toll gates and/or security check points.

Limitations and conclusion

While this research has aimed to cover a cross-section of commute life across the country, it still has several limitations:

·       More respondents are needed if the whole of Nigeria is to be studied.

·       It does not account for bad roads or accidents, which is a predominant factor for congestion, especially in Lagos.

·       It is general knowledge that several Lagos commuters tend to leave home earlier in the mornings to avoid the dense traffic. This is also not considered in this research.

·       The home locations of the respondents are also not accounted for, and this is also a significant contributor to the time it takes to get to work and back.

·       Specific sectors, such as delivery, manufacturing, supply chain, retail and emergency services, are highly dependent on logistics and traffic flow (Takyi et al., 2013). Businesses in this sector would obviously be more impacted by losses as a result of late delivery of goods and services due to traffic congestion. This is not accounted for.

·       Other than time lost in traffic, time lost as a result of low productivity caused by traffic has not been covered in this study.

In general, it is true that a considerable amount of time is spent on roads in frustrating traffic. This contributes to late start times at work and meetings, including the stress of workers, which could be a source of low morale at work. This, in turn, influences productivity and may have an impact on organisations’ contribution to the economy.

It should be noted that while this data is an accurate theoretical representation of the country, it is still mostly speculative. More research and other factors need to be considered to determine an actual relationship between hours spent in traffic and its impact on the economy.

Also, since Lagos is a hotspot for most commuting workers in the country, it might be beneficial to focus future in-depth research in this metropolitan city.

References

Economics Online (n.d.) Road congestion [Online]. Available at https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/Market_failures/Road_congestion.html (Accessed 01 May 2020).

The Economist (2018) The hidden cost of congestion [Online]. Available at https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/02/28/the-hidden-cost-of-congestion (Accessed 01 May 2020).

Melissa B., Dangaia S. and Daniel P. (2018) Bicycling for Transportation, Oxford, Elsevier.

SleepFoundation.org (2015) National Sleep Foundation Recommends New Sleep Times [Online]. Available at https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-release/national-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times (Accessed 01 May 2020).

National Bureau of Statistics (2010) National Manpower Stock and Employment Generation Survey – Household and Micro Enterprise (Informal Sector), National Bureau of Statistics.

Takyi, H., Kofi, P. and Anin, K. E. (2013) ‘An Assessment of Traffic Congestion and Its Effect on Productivity in Urban Ghana’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 225–234.

Trading Economics (2020) Nigeria National Minimum Wage [Online]. Available at https://tradingeconomics.com/nigeria/minimum-wages (Accessed 01 May 2020).

Tribune Online (2019) In A City That Doesn’t Sleep, Many Are Running Mental [Online]. Available at https://tribuneonlineng.com/in-a-city-that-doesnt-sleep-many-are-running-mental/ (Accessed 01 May 2020).

Wednesday, 1 July 2020

THE KING VERSUS THE KINGMAKER

In the history of mankind, kings have always been made by kingmakers.

I read the story of Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick (22 November 1428 – 14 April 1471), known as Warwick the Kingmaker, from Wikipedia and other history books and saw so many lessons and parallels to draw from, for the kings, would be kings and kingmakers.

He was an English nobleman, administrator, and military commander who became Earl of Warwick through marriage. He became wealthy and very powerful, having political connections that went beyond the shores of the country.

With this clout, history has it that he was instrumental in the deposition of two kings, which led to his title, "Kingmaker".

Originally, he was a supporter of King Henry VI; however, a territorial dispute with Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, led him to collaborate with Richard, Duke of York, in opposing King Henry VI.

This conflict, benefited him greatly in the following years, having become Captain of Calais. In the course of this political battle, York was killed, and Warwick's father.

York's son, with Warwick's assistance, later triumphed, and was crowned King Edward IV. Edward initially ruled with Warwick's support, but the two later fell apart.

Warwick was torn between two ends. To install George, Duke of Clarence (Edwards brother), or to restore Henry VI to the throne. He chose the later.

The victory what was short-lived, as he was defeated on 14 April 1471, by Edward at the Battle of Barnet, and killed.

In 1999, Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu became the governor of the most populous state in Nigeria, which is also one of the richest states.

Over the years, he too, like Warwick became powerful and wealthy with political connections extending beyond Lagos State.

As the years wore on, his wealth, power and clout continued to grow. Political big-wigs started reckoning with him and were joining forces with him, or risk political death. At least in the South Western states of Nigeria.

The climax of the powerful political growth was reached in 2015, when he successfully and strategically rallied opposition parties to dethrone the incumbent President of the Federal republic of Nigeria, Good luck Ebele Jonathan.

The icing on the cake, which was used to sway the masses was the erstwhile impeccable characteristics of former Head of State Rtd. Major General Muhammadu Buhari, who was, and is still seen by many as not corrupt, and would be able to tackle the security challenges facing the nation.

From 2015, starting from the first speech given by President Mohammadu Buhari, where he stated that "he belonged to everybody and he belonged to no one", the tone that an imminent battle was soon going to ensue between the king and the kingmaker, was set.

Till date, there have been overtures and maneuvers, plots and counter-plots in the political sphere of Nigeria.

Having made a king in the president and other kings in several governors, it is wildly touted that the time has come for the kingmaker to make himself king.

This is a rare feat to achieve barring the one seen in Russia, albeit not an easy one.

It is however wise, for kingmakers to remain as kingmakers and wiser  still, to step back, become an elder statesman when the ovation is loudest.

Sadly, kings and kingmakers have always had many people around them who do not have their interests at heart. These people cheer them on when they are actually on a downward spiral.

It is logical, and behooves on the king and kingmakers to sniff the air objectively and not be carried away by the chants of sycophants.

MansaMusa has spoken!

Friday, 3 August 2018

NIGERIA: LED WITHOUT VISION


NIGERIA: LED WITHOUT VISION

One of the marks of great and true leaders and leadership is vision. A leader is meant to know where he or she is heading for and in so doing guide the followers to the land of promise or to the delivery of the coveted service. On the journey, it may not be clear to the followers, but the leader has a mental road map of the way.

The journey of the nation Nigeria started with some prominent Nigerians who came to a logical conclusion that Nigeria must be governed by Nigerians. A simple vision. But strong enough to die for. Amongst these were the likes of Sir. Ahmadu Bello, Chief Anthony Enahoro, Herbert Macaulay, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Funilayo Ransome Kuti, Sir. (Dr.) Nnamdi Azikiwe, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa (all of blessed memory).   

Though these honourable Nigerians were from different cultures, regions and practiced different religion, they had a common goal. A common vision. This vision was to free Nigeria. This, they exalted above tribe, creed, religion and people. No wonder they were unstoppable.

Unfortunately, in the zest and zeal for the freedom of Nigeria, the vision did not see beyond the freedom to prepare for. This became a problem shortly after the independence as the first coup d’etat took place in January of 1966.

General Aguiyi Ironsi, suddenly had power thrust upon him, hence the beginning of a lack of National vision by the subsequent leaders in Nigeria aside from personal and vested interests. The coup that occurred in the same year, 1966, which brought General Yakubu Gowon into power, was more or less a retaliatory one, and eventually plunged the nation into the dark history of the civil war.

The Gowon administration was later toppled by General Murtala Mohammed with the reason (not vision) to correct the wrongs of that administration. A failed coup, though costing the life of General Murtala Mohammed, brought power suddenly on the shoulders of General Olusegun Obasanjo on his first leadership.

Alhaji Shehu Shagari was elected in the 1979 elections and sworn in amidst so much fanfare. Nigerians hoped that things would be better. The hope was still on when in 1983, the General Muhammadu Buhari/ General Babatunde Idiagbon administration took over the helms of affairs. Again, this administration had a pseudo-vision, skewed to fighting corruption only without any thought of national development or nation building.

Alas, in 1985, the General Ibrahim Babangida regime came into power and clung unto the power for nine years and the cracks in the nation started growing deeper. A result of an extented lack of vision. He handed over to an interim government of Chief Earnest Shonekan, whose administration had the sole mandate to conduct elections and hand over!
This was a piece of cake for General Sanni Abacha who seized power. Of course, he seized it. What was he going to do after taking it? Again no vision. His sudden death in office saw a transfer of this power to General Abdulsalam Abubakar who thankfully only stayed in power for one year and handed over to a democratically elected president: General Olusegun Obasanjo (Rtd).

Did he have a vision for Nigeria? A doubt. Especially for someone coming straight from prison. Yes he brought mobile phones et al into the nation. But then, vision for a nation is bigger than such meagre achievements.

As at August of 2006, the late President Umar Musa Yar’adua was looking forward to his retirement as a governor, having served for eight years in Katsina State from 1999 - 2007. Fast forward to December 2006, he emerged as the presidential candidate of the PDP. He had five months to develop his vision for the nation. His painful demise again saw power suddenly fall on Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, his then Vice President.

The GEJ administration was loathed by Nigerians for so many reasons and the theme Change was well packaged for us. It was Anything-But-Jonathan (ABJ). Honourably, he relinquished power (the first in Nigeria and Africa) to Rtd. General Muhammadu Buhari. It took PMB six months after taking office, before a cabinet was formed (there has been no change since then, even with so much abuse). Three years down the line, the administration was still blaming the GEJ administration for Nigeria’s problems. What a shame. One would think that the administration knew what to do and would hit the ground running.

Recently there was a gale of defections between the ruling and the opposition parties. The Senate President came up and declared to the world that one of the reasons for his defection was that, in his words, “The Federal Government appointed over 200 persons into juicy offices without allotting any slot to me or (Speaker, House of Representatives, Yakubu) Dogara. Everything went to Katsina, Katsina, Lagos, Lagos. If not for the love I have for Nigeria, we would have scattered everything”.

What a shame! The Yoruba proverb translated says “the elders are not hasty in speech, but rather hasty in seeing”. This is the Senate President speaking. The third citizen of the country. The late President J. F. Kennedy said “think not of what your country can do for you, but think of what you can do for your country”.

Aside from the honourable men and women who fought for the independence of the nation, successive administrations have had no vision for the nation to develop. As epitomized and communicated in clear terms by Dr. Bukola Saraki, the sitting Senate President, the leaders we have in Nigeria only have vested and personal interests.

We must wake up and elect leaders with a vision! It doesn’t stop there. We must also hold them accountable and demand their recall when they are not performing.

#ANewNigeriaIsPossible #ANewKwaraIsPossible.

MansaMusa has spoken!

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

Divided Loyalties

One of the greatest values of the human race is loyalty.

Marriages have been broken, friendships ended and nations have even gone to war at the discovery of disloyalty from erstwhile allies.

Just recently, the POTUS recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and there was an outcry from every quarter globally.

This post is not about the declaration/recognition by the POTUS, rather it is about PMB of Nigeria.

Historically, taking swift and decisive decisions is not a strength of the POFRoN. On the two occasions of his medical sojourn in Europe, Nigerians had to practically beg him to at least talk to and with them.

Over the period of the administrations tenure so far, the issue of herdsmen killing people has almost always featured side-by-side the issue of Boko Haram.

On an occasion, the governor of Kaduna State was reported to have said he has paid these men to stop them from the killings.

In the midst of all these, the POTUS recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and within 48 hours PMB of Nigeria was quick to join the rest of the UN members (majority at least) in denouncing the move.

Yet, it took PMD over three weeks to make a statement on twitter about the fuel crisis that had been biting since November 2017 and days and weeks to also comment on the Benue massacre albeit, to move the IGP to Benue.

My rhetorical question is where does the loyalty lie? To the UN solidarity or to Nigeria and Nigerians?

Mansa Musa has spoken......

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

My 40th Birthday

So today, I am 40!!!

Forty years of God's faithfulness. All I have to say is thank you Lord.

The Lord has been Good to me and my family and I am glad.

A wonderful wife He has blessed me with. I addition  He gave us great children.

What more can I say. Glory be to you Lord.

Many people were around, courtesy of my beautiful wife who started the organization a long time ago.

Indeed, life begins at forty. And it shall be a most wonderful year and years ahead.

Monday, 25 December 2017

On Buhari's Moves & Motions

Nigeria has had several governments. Each of these were labelled or tagged by the leader of that day. So we had Gowon regime, Muritala, Obasanjo, Babangida, Abacha and lastly Abdulsalam regimes. These are all military generals and leaders. One would not expect anything less of these men.

A different twist though, it is for General Muhammed Buhari who, fate has favoured to be the current civilian president. In his time as HoS in 1983 - 1985, the administration was known as Buhari-Idiagbon regime!

This spoke, has spoken and still speaks volumes. For one, it is known widely and globally that General Tunde Idiagbon was the drive and strength of that administration. It also showed GMB as a led-leader.

Fast forward to 2017, twice he went on medical leave and on those occasions he wasn't sorely missed as the VP tended the nation well, to the amazement of many and angst of a few. This is not surprising as like the first shot at leadership, his deputy was the main man. On the second trip though, probably having seen the popularity garnered  by the VP, boundaries were set for him.

On these occasions, not too many times did the citizenry hear from him. All that was heard were from his mouth-pieces. At best these were distorted and conflicting. With a tripartite combination of the information minister and media aides, the confusion and disconnect was rife. Perhaps it is a military strategy to never carry the citizenry along. A strategy this administration condemned the last one for.

In his first term as HoS, one of the first things the administration did was to change the Naira. A move aimed at the supposedly corrupt Nigerians and a strategy of war on corruption. In February 2016, a similar strategy was employed. This time round, it was to place restrictions on all foreign denominated accounts. For an import dependent country, this rocked the rather fragile economic boat with ripple effects of a dollar exchanging for almost five hundred Naira at the peak. Guess work that has thrown the nation into unnecessary hardship.

In the Daily Times news paper of Tuesday, 7 June 1977, the Commissioner  for Petroleum, incidentally GMB, said "Fuel Crisis May Be Over Next Year". Forty years down the line, the same man is the Minister of Petroleum and the crisis is still there! There were tell tale signs that there would be crisis as far back as in November 2017 which saw a lot of panic buying and ques. By December the issue of PENGASSAN came up aggravating the matter. The crisis did not and has not reduced.

As usual, PMB only made a statement on Saturday, 24 December after outcries from the people.  Recall that the same PMB condemned  the suffering of the people when there was a similar crisis in the last administration.  Ironically, we seem to be back to 1977 on at best, guess-promises.

On ascension of the highly exalted and coveted position of President, it took our dear president a little over six months to gather a cabinet. It is said that slow and steady wins the race, however, in this case, the race seem to have been lost even before it began. The members of FEC  are not spirits and so why did it take that long to assemble? And don't we still have former governors and other government officials who have been accused of corruption appointed in this administration even after the long wait?

The administration, from all indications was not prepared for governance and so spent almost three years blaming and still blaming the last administration.

It is accepted globally that military men are trained to be leaders and for leadership. They are also taught to think upon their feet and be fleet on them. These have never been seen, not in the first term as HoS  and certainly not now.

Incidentally, I didn't vote for either candidate in 2015, and the reasons are for another reading. So I am not holding fort for the last administration of GEJ.  I am speaking, ye rather writing as a Nigerian with concerns, and rightly so.

MansaMusa has spoken!